Tesla K20m vs FirePro S7150 x2

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated425
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.69
Power efficiencyno data3.51
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameTongaGK110
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 February 2016 (9 years ago)5 January 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,999 $3,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792 ×22496
Core clock speed920 MHz706 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)265 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate103.0 ×2146.8
Floating-point processing power3.297 TFLOPS ×23.524 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×240
TMUs112 ×2208

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB ×25 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2320 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s ×2208.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.2.1701.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2016 5 January 2013
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 5 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 265 Watt 225 Watt

S7150 x2 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 60% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Tesla K20m, on the other hand, has 17.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S7150 x2 and Tesla K20m. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S7150 x2
FirePro S7150 x2
NVIDIA Tesla K20m
Tesla K20m

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate FirePro S7150 x2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 17 votes

Rate Tesla K20m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S7150 x2 or Tesla K20m, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.