Radeon 625 vs FirePro S7150

Place in performance ranking	519	762
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.07	0.45
Architecture	GCN 3.0 (2014−2017)	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code name	Tonga	Polaris 24
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 February 2016 (8 years ago)	12 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,399	no data
Current price	$7738 (3.2x MSRP)	$68

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Radeon 625 has 543% better value for money than FirePro S7150.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	384
Core clock speed	920 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	1024 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	117.8	24.58
Floating-point performance	3,763 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on FirePro S7150 and Radeon 625 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.3	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro S7150 7.05
+154%

Radeon 625 2.78

FirePro S7150 outperforms Radeon 625 by 154% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FirePro S7150 2726
+154%

Radeon 625 1075

FirePro S7150 outperforms Radeon 625 by 154% in Passmark.