RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs FirePro S7150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro S7150 and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

FirePro S7150
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
8.53

PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF outperforms S7150 by a whopping 696% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking50920
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.24no data
Power efficiency4.5878.13
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameTongaGB203
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 February 2016 (9 years ago)11 August 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20488960
Core clock speed920 MHz790 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1337 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate117.8374.4
Floating-point processing power3.768 TFLOPS23.96 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs128280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70
L1 Cache512 KB8.8 MB
L2 Cache512 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Length241 mm167 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount8 GB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro S7150 8.53
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 67.89
+696%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro S7150 3770
Samples: 7
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 30019
+696%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.53 67.89
Recency 1 February 2016 11 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 70 Watt

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF has a 695.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro S7150 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S7150
FirePro S7150
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 9 votes

Rate FirePro S7150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S7150 or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.