Tegra K1 vs FirePro S7000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking406not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.62no data
Power efficiency5.45no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code namePitcairnGK20A
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date27 August 2012 (12 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280192
Core clock speed950 MHz756 MHz
Boost clock speedno data951 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt8 Watt
Texture fill rate76.007.608
Floating-point processing power2.432 TFLOPS0.3652 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs808

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length292 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1200 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPortNo outputs
DisplayPort count1no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6ES 3.1
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 8 Watt

Tegra K1 has 4275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S7000 and Tegra K1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro S7000 is a workstation graphics card while Tegra K1 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S7000
FirePro S7000
NVIDIA Tegra K1
Tegra K1

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 15 votes

Rate FirePro S7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 9 votes

Rate Tegra K1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.