GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs FirePro S7000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
D300 R5000 S7000 W4000 W5000 W5000 DVI W7000 Radeon Sky 500
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1650 Mobile 1650 Max-Q 1650 Mobile Refresh 1650 Ti Max-Q 1650 Ti Mobile 1660 Max-Q 1660 Mobile 1660 Ti Mobile 1660 Ti Max-Q 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro S7000 with GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

FirePro S7000
2012
4 GB GDDR5, 350 Watt
10.69

1660 Ti Max-Q outperforms S7000 by an impressive 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro S7000 FirePro S7000
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking464300
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.6922.28
Power efficiency5.5226.90
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code namePitcairnTU116
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date27 August 2012 (13 years ago)23 April 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,249 $229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 3129% better value for money than FirePro S7000.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801536
Core clock speed950 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1335 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate76.00128.2
Floating-point processing power2.432 TFLOPS4.101 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs8096
L1 Cache320 KB1.5 MB
L2 Cache512 KB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length292 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPortNo outputs
DisplayPort count1no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro S7000 10.69
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 20.83
+94.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro S7000 4523
Samples: 7
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 8814
+94.9%
Samples: 1441

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
−97.5%
79
+97.5%
4K16−18
−106%
33
+106%

Cost per frame, $

1080p31.23
−977%
2.90
+977%
4K78.06
−1025%
6.94
+1025%
  • GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 977% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 1025% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Fortnite 92
+0%
92
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 78
+0%
78
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Dota 2 94
+0%
94
+0%
Far Cry 5 66
+0%
66
+0%
Fortnite 90
+0%
90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 87
+0%
87
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 48
+0%
48
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+0%
92
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 73
+0%
73
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Dota 2 86
+0%
86
+0%
Far Cry 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+0%
51
+0%
Valorant 93
+0%
93
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 79
+0%
79
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
+0%
31
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how FirePro S7000 and GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 98% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 106% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.69 20.83
Recency 27 August 2012 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 60 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has a 94.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro S7000 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro S7000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD FirePro S7000
FirePro S7000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro S7000 FirePro S7000
vs
S10000 FirePro S10000
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
vs
RX 5600M Radeon RX 5600M
FirePro S7000 FirePro S7000
vs
Tesla K40c Tesla K40c
S10000 FirePro S10000
vs
9500 GT Mac Edition GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition
S10000 FirePro S10000
vs
Instinct MI325X Instinct MI325X
S10000 Passive FirePro S10000 Passive
vs
615 OEM GeForce 615 OEM
S10000 Passive FirePro S10000 Passive
vs
Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile Graphics 64EU Mobile
FirePro S7000 FirePro S7000
vs
HD 6570 HD 6570
FirePro S9000 FirePro S9000
vs
RTX 5050 Mobile RTX 5050 Mobile
FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000
vs
GTX 1650 GTX 1650
FirePro W8000 FirePro W8000
vs
GTX 760 Ti OEM GTX 760 Ti OEM
FirePro W8000 FirePro W8000
vs
FirePro S9010 FirePro S9010
FirePro W9000 FirePro W9000
vs
Tesla P100 SXM2 Tesla P100 SXM2

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.6 16 votes

Rate FirePro S7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 594 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S7000 or GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.