Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics vs FirePro S10000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
D500 D700 S9000 S9010 S9050 S10000 S10000 Passive S10000 Passive 12GB W8000 W9000 Radeon Sky 700 Radeon Sky 900
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8610G 8610G IGP 8650G 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics 8650M 8670A 8670M 8690M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro S10000 with Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics, including specs and performance data.

S10000
2012, $3,599
6 GB GDDR5, 750 Watt
10.85
+348%

S10000 outperforms HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics by a whopping 348% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
S10000 S10000
HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking467887
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.25no data
Power efficiency2.23no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)no data
GPU code nameTahitino data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 November 2012 (13 years ago)1 August 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096 ×2768
Core clock speed825 MHz720 / 775 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,313 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)750 Wattno data
Texture fill rate106.4 ×2no data
Floating-point processing power3.405 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs32 ×2no data
TMUs112 ×2no data
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length305 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB ×2no data
Memory bus width384 Bit ×264 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth480 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPortno data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p130−140
+348%
29
−348%

Cost per frame, $

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how S10000 and HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics compete in popular games:

  • S10000 is 348% faster in 900p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 51 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.85 2.42
Recency 12 November 2012 1 August 2013

S10000 has a 348% higher aggregate performance score.

HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months.

The FirePro S10000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro S10000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

S10000 FirePro S10000
vs
Tesla K40c Tesla K40c
HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
vs
GeForce 930M GeForce 930M
S10000 FirePro S10000
vs
Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
S10000 FirePro S10000
vs
R9 M370X Radeon R9 M370X
S10000 FirePro S10000
vs
HD 8870M Radeon HD 8870M
S10000 FirePro S10000
vs
HD 8790M Radeon HD 8790M
S10000 FirePro S10000
vs
HD 8650M Radeon HD 8650M
S10000 FirePro S10000
vs
HD 8730M Radeon HD 8730M
S10000 FirePro S10000
vs
HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
S10000 FirePro S10000
vs
HD 8670M Radeon HD 8670M
S10000 FirePro S10000
vs
HD 8650G Radeon HD 8650G
S10000 FirePro S10000
vs
HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
S10000 FirePro S10000
vs
R5 M335 Radeon R5 M335

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 40 votes

Rate FirePro S10000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 21 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650G HD 8670M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S10000 or Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.