Radeon HD 7770 vs FirePro S10000
Aggregate performance score
We've compared FirePro S10000 with Radeon HD 7770, including specs and performance data.
S10000 outperforms HD 7770 by a whopping 109% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 454 | 650 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.25 | 1.27 |
Power efficiency | 2.20 | 4.94 |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
GPU code name | Tahiti | Cape Verde |
Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 12 November 2012 (12 years ago) | 15 February 2012 (13 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,599 | $159 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
HD 7770 has 408% better value for money than S10000.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4096 ×2 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 4,313 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 80 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 ×2 | 40.00 |
Floating-point processing power | 3.405 TFLOPS ×2 | 1.28 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 32 ×2 | 16 |
TMUs | 112 ×2 | 40 |
L1 Cache | 448 KB | 160 KB |
L2 Cache | 768 KB | 256 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 305 mm | 210 mm |
Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
Form factor | full height / full length | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB ×2 | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit ×2 | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s ×2 | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Eyefinity | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
Dual-link DVI support | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
900p | 95−100
+102%
| 47
−102%
|
Full HD | 95−100
+102%
| 47
−102%
|
Cost per frame, $
1080p | 37.88
−1020%
| 3.38
+1020%
|
- HD 7770 has 1020% lower cost per frame in 1080p
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Fortnite | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Valorant | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 128
+0%
|
128
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Fortnite | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Valorant | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Valorant | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Valorant | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Valorant | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 0−1 | 0−1 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
This is how S10000 and HD 7770 compete in popular games:
- S10000 is 102% faster in 900p
- S10000 is 102% faster in 1080p
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 10.83 | 5.19 |
Recency | 12 November 2012 | 15 February 2012 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 80 Watt |
S10000 has a 108.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.
HD 7770, on the other hand, has 837.5% lower power consumption.
The FirePro S10000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7770 in performance tests.
Be aware that FirePro S10000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7770 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.