RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile vs FirePro S10000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro S10000 with RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.


S10000
2012, $3,599
6 GB GDDR5, 750 Watt
10.85

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms S10000 by a whopping 252% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking467134
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.25no data
Power efficiency2.2325.54
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTahitiAD106
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date12 November 2012 (13 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096 ×24608
Core clock speed825 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)750 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate106.4 ×2244.1
Floating-point processing power3.405 TFLOPS ×215.62 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×248
TMUs112 ×2144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L1 Cache448 KB4.5 MB
L2 Cache768 KB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length305 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB ×28 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth480 GB/s ×2256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

S10000 10.85
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 38.15
+252%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

S10000 4537
Samples: 8
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 16055
+254%
Samples: 319

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.85 38.15
Recency 12 November 2012 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 750 Watt 115 Watt

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 252% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 33% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 552% lower power consumption.

The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro S10000 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro S10000 is a workstation graphics card while RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 40 votes

Rate FirePro S10000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 12 votes

Rate RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S10000 or RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.