Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs FirePro S10000

Place in performance ranking	371	387
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.73	no data
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Gen. 12 Xe (2020)
GPU code name	Tahiti	iDG1LPDEV
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	12 November 2012 (11 years ago)	31 October 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$3,599	no data
Current price	$22 (0x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	96
Core clock speed	825 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	950 MHz	1650 MHz
Number of transistors	4,313 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	750 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	106.4	79.20
Floating-point performance	2x 3,405 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on FirePro S10000 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x4
Length	305 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Form factor	full height / full length	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	LPDDR4x
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	4266 MHz
Memory bandwidth	480 GB/s	68.26 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Dual-link DVI support	1	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

S10000 12.35
+8%

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 11.43

FirePro S10000 outperforms Iris Xe MAX Graphics by 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

S10000 4768
+142%

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 1971

FirePro S10000 outperforms Iris Xe MAX Graphics by 142% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	27−30 +3.8%	26 −3.8%
1440p	21−24 +5%	20 −5%
4K	18−20 +5.9%	17 −5.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20
+0%

18−20

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +4.3%	21−24 −4.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −5.6%	19 +5.6%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −2.9%	35−40 +2.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +4.3%	21−24 −4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 −6.7%	30−35 +6.7%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Hitman 3	24−27 +0%	24 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +4.2%	48 −4.2%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +5.3%	57 −5.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +6.1%	33 −6.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +2.6%	39 −2.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +4.3%	21−24 −4.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +0%	6 +0%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −2.9%	35−40 +2.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +4.3%	21−24 −4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 −6.7%	30−35 +6.7%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Hitman 3	12−14 +0%	12 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +6.4%	45−50 −6.4%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +6.1%	33 −6.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +0%	30 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +6.1%	33 −6.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +2.9%	34 −2.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +4.3%	21−24 −4.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +4.3%	21−24 −4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +3.8%	26 −3.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +3.4%	29 −3.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +0%	18 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30
+8%

−8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −4.8%	21−24 +4.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +5%	20−22 −5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Hitman 3	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +4.3%	21−24 −4.3%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +5%	20 −5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−5.6%

18−20
+5.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Hitman 3	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −10%	11 +10%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

−10%

10−12
+10%

This is how S10000 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics compete in popular games:

S10000 is 4% faster in 1080p
S10000 is 5% faster in 1440p
S10000 is 6% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	12.35	11.43
Recency	12 November 2012	31 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	750 Watt	25 Watt