Radeon 530X Mobile vs FirePro R5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking613not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.26no data
Power efficiency3.22no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code namePitcairnPolaris 24
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 February 2013 (12 years ago)18 April 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,099 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768384
Core clock speed825 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1024 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate39.6024.58
Floating-point processing power1.267 TFLOPS0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs4824
L1 Cache192 KB96 KB
L2 Cache512 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length279 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s36 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 February 2013 18 April 2017
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 50 Watt

530X Mobile has an age advantage of 4 years, and 600% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro R5000 and Radeon 530X Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro R5000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 530X Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro R5000
FirePro R5000
AMD Radeon 530X Mobile
Radeon 530X Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate FirePro R5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon 530X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro R5000 or Radeon 530X Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.