GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs FirePro M6100

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro M6100 with GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, including specs and performance data.

FirePro M6100
2014
2 GB GDDR5
5.71

RTX 3070 Ti outperforms M6100 by a whopping 945% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking60535
Place by popularitynot in top-10087
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data52.72
Power efficiencyno data14.45
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameEmeraldGA104
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2014 (10 years ago)31 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8966144
Core clock speed1100 MHz1575 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data290 Watt
Texture fill rate61.60339.8
Floating-point processing power1.971 TFLOPS21.75 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs56192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1188 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s608.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.5 (6.0)6.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.2.1701.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro M6100 5.71
RTX 3070 Ti 59.66
+945%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro M6100 2245
RTX 3070 Ti 23476
+946%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

FirePro M6100 5369
RTX 3070 Ti 49760
+827%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

FirePro M6100 19876
RTX 3070 Ti 120454
+506%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

FirePro M6100 3837
RTX 3070 Ti 37663
+882%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

FirePro M6100 25342
RTX 3070 Ti 208428
+722%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

FirePro M6100 36
RTX 3070 Ti 281
+681%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

FirePro M6100 58
RTX 3070 Ti 102
+75.6%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

FirePro M6100 49
+226%
RTX 3070 Ti 15

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

FirePro M6100 42
RTX 3070 Ti 137
+229%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

FirePro M6100 36
RTX 3070 Ti 73
+99.7%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

FirePro M6100 26
RTX 3070 Ti 193
+637%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

FirePro M6100 1
RTX 3070 Ti 18
+2917%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD52
−240%
177
+240%
1440p8−9
−1063%
93
+1063%
4K5−6
−1100%
60
+1100%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.38
1440pno data6.44
4Kno data9.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−1254%
170−180
+1254%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1508%
193
+1508%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−1518%
178
+1518%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−1254%
170−180
+1254%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−604%
160−170
+604%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1167%
152
+1167%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−1182%
141
+1182%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−1181%
205
+1181%
Fortnite 30−35
−673%
250−260
+673%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−772%
210−220
+772%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−1650%
210
+1650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−743%
170−180
+743%
Valorant 65−70
−377%
300−350
+377%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−1254%
170−180
+1254%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−604%
160−170
+604%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−992%
131
+992%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95
−202%
270−280
+202%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−1027%
124
+1027%
Dota 2 45−50
−453%
249
+453%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−1125%
196
+1125%
Fortnite 30−35
−673%
250−260
+673%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−772%
210−220
+772%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−1533%
196
+1533%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−811%
173
+811%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−1350%
145
+1350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−743%
170−180
+743%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1847%
292
+1847%
Valorant 65−70
−377%
300−350
+377%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−604%
160−170
+604%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−850%
114
+850%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−927%
113
+927%
Dota 2 45−50
−411%
230
+411%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−1044%
183
+1044%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−772%
210−220
+772%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−900%
120−130
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−743%
170−180
+743%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−880%
147
+880%
Valorant 65−70
−377%
300−350
+377%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
−673%
250−260
+673%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−500%
45−50
+500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−874%
400−450
+874%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−2183%
137
+2183%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−2125%
89
+2125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−386%
170−180
+386%
Valorant 60−65
−469%
350−400
+469%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−1871%
130−140
+1871%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1725%
73
+1725%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−1264%
150
+1264%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1292%
180−190
+1292%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−900%
90−95
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−1450%
120−130
+1450%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
−1273%
150−160
+1273%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−880%
45−50
+880%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 30−35
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−765%
147
+765%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−5350%
109
+5350%
Valorant 27−30
−1029%
300−350
+1029%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−3133%
95−100
+3133%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 16
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1650%
35
+1650%
Dota 2 18−20
−921%
194
+921%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1267%
82
+1267%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1550%
130−140
+1550%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1500%
95−100
+1500%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−1480%
75−80
+1480%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus 56
+0%
56
+0%

This is how FirePro M6100 and RTX 3070 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Ti is 240% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 Ti is 1063% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 Ti is 1100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3070 Ti is 5350% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Ti is ahead in 61 test (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.71 59.66
Recency 27 May 2014 31 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm

RTX 3070 Ti has a 944.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M6100 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro M6100 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M6100
FirePro M6100
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 152 votes

Rate FirePro M6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6520 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M6100 or GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.