Radeon RX 5700 XT vs FirePro M6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro M6000 with Radeon RX 5700 XT, including specs and performance data.

FirePro M6000
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 43 Watt
4.66

RX 5700 XT outperforms M6000 by a whopping 804% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking65492
Place by popularitynot in top-10041
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data46.12
Power efficiency7.5913.11
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameHeathrowNavi 10
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 July 2012 (12 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6402560
Core clock speed800 MHz1605 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1905 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)43 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate32.00304.8
Floating-point processing power1.024 TFLOPS9.754 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs40160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data272 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorMXM-Bno data
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+
StereoOutput3D+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.131+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro M6000 4.66
RX 5700 XT 42.11
+804%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro M6000 1820
RX 5700 XT 16460
+804%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

FirePro M6000 2422
RX 5700 XT 35823
+1379%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

FirePro M6000 10744
RX 5700 XT 83961
+681%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p58
−762%
500−550
+762%
Full HD39
−226%
127
+226%
1440p8−9
−863%
77
+863%
4K5−6
−860%
48
+860%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.14
1440pno data5.18
4Kno data8.31

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−830%
93
+830%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−680%
78
+680%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−564%
93
+564%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−660%
76
+660%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−720%
82
+720%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1132%
234
+1132%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−1344%
130
+1344%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−1318%
156
+1318%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−667%
115
+667%
Valorant 12−14
−1362%
190
+1362%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−1286%
194
+1286%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−540%
64
+540%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−620%
72
+620%
Dota 2 14−16
−747%
127
+747%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−148%
57
+148%
Fortnite 27−30
−550%
180−190
+550%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−916%
193
+916%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−1122%
110
+1122%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−867%
145
+867%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−909%
111
+909%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−515%
246
+515%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−340%
66
+340%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−869%
150−160
+869%
Valorant 12−14
−762%
112
+762%
World of Tanks 75−80
−258%
270−280
+258%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−479%
81
+479%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−470%
57
+470%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−530%
63
+530%
Dota 2 14−16
−587%
103
+587%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−343%
100−110
+343%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−800%
171
+800%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−1056%
104
+1056%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−418%
200−210
+418%
Valorant 12−14
−1123%
159
+1123%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 4−5
−1875%
79
+1875%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−1480%
79
+1480%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−465%
170−180
+465%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1300%
42
+1300%
World of Tanks 30−35
−700%
270−280
+700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−1043%
80
+1043%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−680%
39
+680%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−1280%
130−140
+1280%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1600%
119
+1600%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−1100%
72
+1100%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−3367%
104
+3367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−863%
75−80
+863%
Valorant 12−14
−815%
119
+815%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−365%
79
+365%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−394%
79
+394%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1008%
144
+1008%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−800%
27
+800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−394%
79
+394%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−1200%
52
+1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−750%
17
+750%
Dota 2 16−18
−447%
93
+447%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1220%
65−70
+1220%
Fortnite 4−5
−1475%
60−65
+1475%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1675%
71
+1675%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−1750%
37
+1750%
Valorant 4−5
−1450%
62
+1450%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8
+0%
8
+0%

This is how FirePro M6000 and RX 5700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700 XT is 762% faster in 900p
  • RX 5700 XT is 226% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5700 XT is 863% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5700 XT is 860% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 5700 XT is 3367% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 5700 XT is ahead in 60 tests (94%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.66 42.11
Recency 1 July 2012 7 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 43 Watt 225 Watt

FirePro M6000 has 423.3% lower power consumption.

RX 5700 XT, on the other hand, has a 803.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro M6000 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 5700 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M6000
FirePro M6000
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 15 votes

Rate FirePro M6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 8371 vote

Rate Radeon RX 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M6000 or Radeon RX 5700 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.