GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs FirePro M6000

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro M6000 with GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, including specs and performance data.

FirePro M6000
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 43 Watt
4.68

RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms M6000 by a whopping 1548% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking65111
Place by popularitynot in top-10018
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data67.35
Power efficiency7.5924.45
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameHeathrowAD104
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 July 2012 (12 years ago)8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6407168
Core clock speed800 MHz1980 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2475 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)43 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate32.00554.4
Floating-point processing power1.024 TFLOPS35.48 TFLOPS
ROPs1680
TMUs40224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorMXM-Bno data
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s504.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+
StereoOutput3D+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro M6000 4.68
RTX 4070 SUPER 77.14
+1548%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro M6000 1820
RTX 4070 SUPER 30029
+1550%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

FirePro M6000 2422
RTX 4070 SUPER 68373
+2723%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p58
−1538%
950−1000
+1538%
Full HD39
−459%
218
+459%
1440p8−9
−1713%
145
+1713%
4K5−6
−1600%
85
+1600%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.75
1440pno data4.13
4Kno data7.05

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1760%
186
+1760%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−1500%
160−170
+1500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−736%
110−120
+736%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1720%
182
+1720%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−1500%
160−170
+1500%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−2070%
434
+2070%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−2211%
200−210
+2211%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−1300%
150−160
+1300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−867%
140−150
+867%
Valorant 12−14
−3277%
400−450
+3277%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−736%
110−120
+736%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1490%
159
+1490%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−1500%
160−170
+1500%
Dota 2 14−16
−1053%
173
+1053%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−561%
152
+561%
Fortnite 27−30
−1000%
300−350
+1000%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−2040%
428
+2040%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−2211%
200−210
+2211%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1053%
173
+1053%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−573%
74
+573%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−438%
210−220
+438%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−867%
140−150
+867%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−988%
170−180
+988%
Valorant 12−14
−3277%
400−450
+3277%
World of Tanks 75−80
−258%
270−280
+258%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−736%
110−120
+736%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1290%
139
+1290%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−1500%
160−170
+1500%
Dota 2 14−16
−1500%
240−250
+1500%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−526%
140−150
+526%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−1805%
381
+1805%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−2211%
200−210
+2211%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−438%
210−220
+438%
Valorant 12−14
−3277%
400−450
+3277%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 4−5
−3600%
148
+3600%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−2860%
148
+2860%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−465%
170−180
+465%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3000%
90−95
+3000%
World of Tanks 30−35
−1418%
500−550
+1418%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−1143%
85−90
+1143%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1500%
80−85
+1500%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−1500%
160−170
+1500%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−3686%
265
+3686%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−2517%
150−160
+2517%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−4467%
130−140
+4467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−1825%
154
+1825%
Valorant 12−14
−2738%
350−400
+2738%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−850%
55−60
+850%
Dota 2 16−18
−876%
166
+876%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−938%
166
+938%
Metro Exodus 0−1 74
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1508%
200−210
+1508%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2033%
60−65
+2033%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−938%
166
+938%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−2175%
90−95
+2175%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−217%
19
+217%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Dota 2 16−18
−1547%
280−290
+1547%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−2000%
100−110
+2000%
Fortnite 4−5
−2300%
95−100
+2300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3200%
132
+3200%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%
Valorant 4−5
−5275%
210−220
+5275%

This is how FirePro M6000 and RTX 4070 SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 1538% faster in 900p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 459% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 1713% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 1600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4070 SUPER is 5275% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4070 SUPER surpassed FirePro M6000 in all 54 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.68 77.14
Recency 1 July 2012 8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 43 Watt 220 Watt

FirePro M6000 has 411.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 1548.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro M6000 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M6000
FirePro M6000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 15 votes

Rate FirePro M6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 4594 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.