GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs FirePro M6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking713not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.78no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameHeathrowG80
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 July 2012 (13 years ago)12 February 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$269

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64096
Core clock speed800 MHz513 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)43 Watt143 Watt
Texture fill rate32.0024.62
Floating-point processing power1.024 TFLOPS0.2281 TFLOPS
ROPs1620
TMUs4024
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB80 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorMXM-Bno data
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB320 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz792 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s63.36 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video
StereoOutput3D+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2012 12 February 2007
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 320 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 43 Watt 143 Watt

FirePro M6000 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 540% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 232.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M6000 and GeForce 8800 GTS 320. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M6000 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce 8800 GTS 320 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M6000
FirePro M6000
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
GeForce 8800 GTS 320

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 15 votes

Rate FirePro M6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 30 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS 320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M6000 or GeForce 8800 GTS 320, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.