Tesla S1070 vs FirePro M6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking713not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.78no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameHeathrowGT200B
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date1 July 2012 (13 years ago)1 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640240 ×4
Core clock speed800 MHz610 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)43 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rate32.0048.80 ×4
Floating-point processing power1.024 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs1632 ×4
TMUs4080 ×4
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorMXM-Bno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB ×4
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed1000 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s102.4 GB/s ×4
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
StereoOutput3D+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2012 1 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 43 Watt 800 Watt

FirePro M6000 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1760.5% lower power consumption.

Tesla S1070, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M6000 and Tesla S1070. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M6000 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Tesla S1070 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M6000
FirePro M6000
NVIDIA Tesla S1070
Tesla S1070

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 15 votes

Rate FirePro M6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 9 votes

Rate Tesla S1070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M6000 or Tesla S1070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.