ATI Radeon HD 4570 vs FirePro M5950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro M5950 with Radeon HD 4570, including specs and performance data.

FirePro M5950
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 35 Watt
2.97
+560%

M5950 outperforms HD 4570 by a whopping 560% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7881292
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.841.45
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameWhistlerRV710
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date4 January 2011 (14 years ago)25 November 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48080
Core clock speed725 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors716 million242 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate17.405.200
Floating-point processing power0.696 TFLOPS0.104 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs248
L1 Cache48 KB16 KB
L2 Cache256 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Form factorMXM-Ano data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth57 GB/s8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.04.1
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro M5950 2.97
+560%
ATI HD 4570 0.45

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro M5950 1314
+564%
Samples: 2
ATI HD 4570 198

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p24
+700%
3−4
−700%
Full HD26
+767%
3−4
−767%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Fortnite 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Valorant 45−50
+586%
7−8
−586%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+638%
8−9
−638%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Dota 2 30−33
+650%
4−5
−650%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Fortnite 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Metro Exodus 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Valorant 45−50
+586%
7−8
−586%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Dota 2 30−33
+650%
4−5
−650%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Valorant 45−50
+586%
7−8
−586%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Valorant 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 6−7 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Valorant 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5 0−1

This is how FirePro M5950 and ATI HD 4570 compete in popular games:

  • FirePro M5950 is 700% faster in 900p
  • FirePro M5950 is 767% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.97 0.45
Recency 4 January 2011 25 November 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

FirePro M5950 has a 560% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 4570, on the other hand, has 40% lower power consumption.

The FirePro M5950 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4570 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro M5950 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 4570 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M5950
FirePro M5950
ATI Radeon HD 4570
Radeon HD 4570

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 71 votes

Rate FirePro M5950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 39 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M5950 or Radeon HD 4570, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.