Radeon Pro 580 vs ATI FirePro M5800
Aggregate performance score
We've compared FirePro M5800 and Radeon Pro 580, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Pro 580 outperforms ATI M5800 by a whopping 1302% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1042 | 314 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 3.87 | 9.41 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | Madison | Polaris 20 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 1 March 2010 (15 years ago) | 5 June 2017 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 400 | 2304 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1200 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 627 million | 5,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 26 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 13.00 | 172.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.52 TFLOPS | 5.53 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 32 |
| TMUs | 20 | 144 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1695 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 217.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 21
−1281%
| 290−300
+1281%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
| God of War | 6−7
−1233%
|
80−85
+1233%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
| Fortnite | 4−5
−1275%
|
55−60
+1275%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−1275%
|
110−120
+1275%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
| God of War | 6−7
−1233%
|
80−85
+1233%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
−1300%
|
140−150
+1300%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−1264%
|
450−500
+1264%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 30−33
−1233%
|
400−450
+1233%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−1253%
|
230−240
+1253%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
| Fortnite | 4−5
−1275%
|
55−60
+1275%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−1275%
|
110−120
+1275%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
| God of War | 6−7
−1233%
|
80−85
+1233%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
−1300%
|
140−150
+1300%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−1257%
|
95−100
+1257%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−1264%
|
450−500
+1264%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−1253%
|
230−240
+1253%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−1275%
|
110−120
+1275%
|
| God of War | 6−7
−1233%
|
80−85
+1233%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
−1300%
|
140−150
+1300%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−1257%
|
95−100
+1257%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−1264%
|
450−500
+1264%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 4−5
−1275%
|
55−60
+1275%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−1275%
|
55−60
+1275%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 8−9
−1275%
|
110−120
+1275%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
−1257%
|
190−200
+1257%
|
| Valorant | 5−6
−1300%
|
70−75
+1300%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−1300%
|
210−220
+1300%
|
| Valorant | 7−8
−1257%
|
95−100
+1257%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Dota 2 | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
| God of War | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
This is how ATI M5800 and Pro 580 compete in popular games:
- Pro 580 is 1281% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.32 | 18.50 |
| Recency | 1 March 2010 | 5 June 2017 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 26 Watt | 150 Watt |
ATI M5800 has 476.9% lower power consumption.
Pro 580, on the other hand, has a 1301.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon Pro 580 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M5800 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
