Quadro T2000 Mobile vs ATI FirePro M5800

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro M5800 and Quadro T2000 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI M5800
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 26 Watt
1.44

T2000 Mobile outperforms ATI M5800 by a whopping 1340% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking999266
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.8023.68
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameMadisonTU117
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date1 March 2010 (14 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4001024
Core clock speed650 MHz1575 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1785 MHz
Number of transistors627 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)26 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate13.00114.2
Floating-point processing power0.52 TFLOPS3.656 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21
−1329%
300−350
+1329%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−725%
30−35
+725%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−667%
45−50
+667%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−950%
40−45
+950%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−725%
30−35
+725%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2300%
45−50
+2300%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−4133%
120−130
+4133%
Hitman 3 6−7
−583%
40−45
+583%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−560%
95−100
+560%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−763%
65−70
+763%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−182%
90−95
+182%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−667%
45−50
+667%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−950%
40−45
+950%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−725%
30−35
+725%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2300%
45−50
+2300%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−4133%
120−130
+4133%
Hitman 3 6−7
−583%
40−45
+583%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−560%
95−100
+560%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−763%
65−70
+763%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−318%
45−50
+318%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−182%
90−95
+182%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−667%
45−50
+667%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−950%
40−45
+950%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−725%
30−35
+725%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2300%
45−50
+2300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−4133%
120−130
+4133%
Hitman 3 6−7
−583%
40−45
+583%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−560%
95−100
+560%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−763%
65−70
+763%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−318%
45−50
+318%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−182%
90−95
+182%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1500%
30−35
+1500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 21−24
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Hitman 3 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−740%
40−45
+740%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−1629%
120−130
+1629%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−750%
30−35
+750%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 10−12
Far Cry 5 0−1 10−12

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Hitman 3 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how ATI M5800 and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T2000 Mobile is 1329% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 4133% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T2000 Mobile is ahead in 49 tests (71%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.44 20.73
Recency 1 March 2010 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 26 Watt 60 Watt

ATI M5800 has 130.8% lower power consumption.

T2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1339.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M5800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro M5800
FirePro M5800
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 9 votes

Rate FirePro M5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 395 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.