GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs ATI FirePro M5800
Aggregate performance score
We've compared FirePro M5800 with GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms ATI M5800 by a whopping 4829% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1036 | 28 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 3.81 | 40.71 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | Madison | AD103 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 March 2010 (15 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 400 | 9728 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 1335 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1695 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 627 million | 45,900 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 26 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 13.00 | 515.3 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.52 TFLOPS | 32.98 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 112 |
| TMUs | 20 | 304 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 304 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 76 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 576.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.9 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 21
−714%
| 171
+714%
|
| 1440p | 2−3
−6450%
| 131
+6450%
|
| 4K | 1−2
−7900%
| 80
+7900%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−4800%
|
147
+4800%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 3−4
−7433%
|
226
+7433%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−8700%
|
170−180
+8700%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−4633%
|
142
+4633%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 3−4
−7200%
|
219
+7200%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−8550%
|
173
+8550%
|
| Fortnite | 4−5
−7450%
|
300−350
+7450%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−3614%
|
260−270
+3614%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
−18000%
|
181
+18000%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−1856%
|
170−180
+1856%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−994%
|
350−400
+994%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−8700%
|
170−180
+8700%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 30−33
−827%
|
270−280
+827%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−4333%
|
133
+4333%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 3−4
−6533%
|
199
+6533%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−1071%
|
199
+1071%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−8250%
|
167
+8250%
|
| Fortnite | 4−5
−7450%
|
300−350
+7450%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−3614%
|
260−270
+3614%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
−17300%
|
174
+17300%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 1−2
−16100%
|
162
+16100%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
−7700%
|
156
+7700%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−1856%
|
170−180
+1856%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−5529%
|
394
+5529%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−994%
|
350−400
+994%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−8700%
|
170−180
+8700%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−4167%
|
128
+4167%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 3−4
−6367%
|
194
+6367%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−1000%
|
187
+1000%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−7800%
|
158
+7800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−3614%
|
260−270
+3614%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−1856%
|
170−180
+1856%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−2814%
|
204
+2814%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−994%
|
350−400
+994%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 4−5
−7450%
|
300−350
+7450%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2
−17200%
|
173
+17200%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 8−9
−6350%
|
516
+6350%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 0−1 | 138 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−2088%
|
170−180
+2088%
|
| Valorant | 6−7
−7983%
|
485
+7983%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−9400%
|
95
+9400%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 4−5
−4600%
|
188
+4600%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−15000%
|
151
+15000%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−7367%
|
220−230
+7367%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−8100%
|
164
+8100%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−7450%
|
150−160
+7450%
|
4K
High Preset
| Dead Island 2 | 3−4
−1700%
|
54
+1700%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
−975%
|
172
+975%
|
| Valorant | 7−8
−4629%
|
300−350
+4629%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 48 |
| Dead Island 2 | 3−4
−3167%
|
98
+3167%
|
| Dota 2 | 1−2
−17800%
|
179
+17800%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−4700%
|
95−100
+4700%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−3850%
|
75−80
+3850%
|
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 300−350
+0%
|
300−350
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 240
+0%
|
240
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 214
+0%
|
214
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Metro Exodus | 117
+0%
|
117
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 88
+0%
|
88
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 314
+0%
|
314
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 82
+0%
|
82
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 150
+0%
|
150
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 90−95
+0%
|
90−95
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 107
+0%
|
107
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
This is how ATI M5800 and RTX 4090 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX 4090 Mobile is 714% faster in 1080p
- RTX 4090 Mobile is 6450% faster in 1440p
- RTX 4090 Mobile is 7900% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 4090 Mobile is 18000% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX 4090 Mobile is ahead in 52 tests (80%)
- there's a draw in 13 tests (20%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.39 | 68.52 |
| Recency | 1 March 2010 | 3 January 2023 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 26 Watt | 120 Watt |
ATI M5800 has 361.5% lower power consumption.
RTX 4090 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 4829.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M5800 in performance tests.
Be aware that FirePro M5800 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
