GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs ATI FirePro M5800

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro M5800 with GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB, including specs and performance data.

ATI M5800
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 26 Watt
1.44

RTX 3050 8 GB outperforms ATI M5800 by a whopping 2178% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1001167
Place by popularitynot in top-10011
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data68.21
Power efficiency3.8217.41
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameMadisonGA106
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 March 2010 (14 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4002560
Core clock speed650 MHz1552 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1777 MHz
Number of transistors627 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)26 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate13.00142.2
Floating-point processing power0.52 TFLOPS9.098 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2080
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21
−2043%
450−500
+2043%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data0.55

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−2122%
200−210
+2122%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Elden Ring 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−2122%
200−210
+2122%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−2122%
200−210
+2122%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−2043%
150−160
+2043%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−2122%
200−210
+2122%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Dota 2 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Elden Ring 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−2173%
250−260
+2173%
Fortnite 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−2122%
200−210
+2122%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−1900%
300−310
+1900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−2043%
150−160
+2043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−2043%
150−160
+2043%
World of Tanks 30−33
−2067%
650−700
+2067%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−2122%
200−210
+2122%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Dota 2 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−2173%
250−260
+2173%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−2122%
200−210
+2122%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−1900%
300−310
+1900%
Elden Ring 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−2122%
200−210
+2122%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
World of Tanks 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−2122%
200−210
+2122%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Valorant 7−8
−2043%
150−160
+2043%
Dota 2 16−18
−2088%
350−400
+2088%
Elden Ring 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1900%
300−310
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1900%
300−310
+1900%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Dota 2 16−18
−2088%
350−400
+2088%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Valorant 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

This is how ATI M5800 and RTX 3050 8 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 8 GB is 2043% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.44 32.80
Recency 1 March 2010 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 26 Watt 130 Watt

ATI M5800 has 400% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 8 GB, on the other hand, has a 2177.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M5800 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro M5800 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro M5800
FirePro M5800
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8
9 votes

Rate FirePro M5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9
13215 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.