GeForce FX 5200 vs ATI FirePro M5800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro M5800 with GeForce FX 5200, including specs and performance data.

ATI M5800
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 26 Watt
1.22
+6000%

M5800 outperforms 5200 by a whopping 6000% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10561548
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.78no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameMadisonNV18 C1
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 March 2010 (15 years ago)6 March 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$69.99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores400no data
Core clock speed650 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors627 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)26 Wattno data
Texture fill rate13.001.000
Floating-point processing power0.52 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs204
L1 Cache40 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)8.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21-0−1

Cost per frame, $

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Fortnite 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 0−1
Valorant 30−35 0−1

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Fortnite 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1
Valorant 30−35 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1
Valorant 30−35 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 4−5 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 0−1
Valorant 5−6 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Valorant 7−8 0−1

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.22 0.02
Recency 1 March 2010 6 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

ATI M5800 has a 6000% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

The FirePro M5800 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5200 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro M5800 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce FX 5200 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro M5800
FirePro M5800
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200
GeForce FX 5200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 9 votes

Rate FirePro M5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 295 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M5800 or GeForce FX 5200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.