GeForce GT 630 OEM vs FirePro M5100

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro M5100 with GeForce GT 630 OEM, including specs and performance data.

FirePro M5100
2013
2 GB GDDR5
5.45
+228%

M5100 outperforms GT 630 OEM by a whopping 228% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking603937
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.31
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameVenusGK107
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date16 October 2013 (11 years ago)24 April 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640192
Core clock speed725 MHz875 MHz
Boost clock speed775 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,500 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate31.0014.00
Floating-point processing power0.992 TFLOPS0.336 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz891 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s28.51 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30
+233%
9−10
−233%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+250%
10−11
−250%
Hitman 3 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+240%
10−11
−240%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+243%
14−16
−243%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+250%
10−11
−250%
Hitman 3 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+240%
10−11
−240%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+243%
14−16
−243%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+250%
10−11
−250%
Hitman 3 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+240%
10−11
−240%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+243%
14−16
−243%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Hitman 3 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+240%
10−11
−240%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Hitman 3 2−3 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

This is how FirePro M5100 and GT 630 OEM compete in popular games:

  • FirePro M5100 is 233% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.45 1.66
Recency 16 October 2013 24 April 2012
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB

FirePro M5100 has a 228.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The FirePro M5100 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 630 OEM in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro M5100 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GT 630 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M5100
FirePro M5100
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
GeForce GT 630 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 134 votes

Rate FirePro M5100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 28 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.