Quadro NVS 295 vs FirePro M4170

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro M4170 with Quadro NVS 295, including specs and performance data.

FirePro M4170
2015
1 GB GDDR5
2.79
+933%

M4170 outperforms NVS 295 by a whopping 933% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8391409
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.90
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameOpalG98
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date23 April 2015 (10 years ago)7 May 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$54.50

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3848
Core clock speed825 MHz540 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data23 Watt
Texture fill rate21.604.320
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS0.0208 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs248
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz695 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s11.12 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)4.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)1.1
Vulkan1.2.170N/A
CUDA-1.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro M4170 2.79
+933%
NVS 295 0.27

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro M4170 1167
+951%
Samples: 25
NVS 295 111
Samples: 337

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.79 0.27
Recency 23 April 2015 7 May 2009
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm

FirePro M4170 has a 933.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

The FirePro M4170 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 295 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro M4170 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Quadro NVS 295 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M4170
FirePro M4170
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
Quadro NVS 295

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 7 votes

Rate FirePro M4170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 21 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M4170 or Quadro NVS 295, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.