GeForce 9200M vs FirePro M4150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro M4150 with GeForce 9200M, including specs and performance data.


FirePro M4150
2013
1 GB GDDR5
2.48
+629%

M4150 outperforms 9200M by a whopping 629% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8801357
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.18
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameOpalC79
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date16 October 2013 (12 years ago)15 October 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38416
Core clock speed715 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors950 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data12 Watt
Texture fill rate17.163.600
Floating-point processing power0.5491 TFLOPS0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs248
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth64 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro M4150 2.48
+629%
GeForce 9200M 0.34

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro M4150 1038
+626%
Samples: 69
GeForce 9200M 143
Samples: 51

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.48 0.34
Recency 16 October 2013 15 October 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm

FirePro M4150 has a 629% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 132% more advanced lithography process.

The FirePro M4150 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9200M in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro M4150 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce 9200M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 17 votes

Rate FirePro M4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M4150 or GeForce 9200M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.