Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile vs FirePro M4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking759not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.90no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameChelseaRenoir
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 June 2012 (13 years ago)6 January 2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512384
Core clock speed675 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate21.6036.00
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS1.152 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs3224
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)IGP
Form factorMXM-Ano data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth72 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
StereoOutput3D+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 June 2012 6 January 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 15 Watt

Graphics 384SP Mobile has an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 120% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M4000 and Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M4000 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M4000
FirePro M4000
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 39 votes

Rate FirePro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M4000 or Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.