Quadro FX Go 1000 vs FirePro M4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking750not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.87no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)no data
GPU code nameChelseano data
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date27 June 2012 (13 years ago)25 February 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5124
Core clock speed675 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Wattno data
Texture fill rate21.60no data
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data
Form factorMXM-Ano data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5128
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth72 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
StereoOutput3D+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)no data
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 June 2012 25 February 2004
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm

FirePro M4000 has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M4000 and Quadro FX Go 1000. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M4000
FirePro M4000
NVIDIA Quadro FX Go 1000
Quadro FX Go 1000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 39 votes

Rate FirePro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX Go 1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M4000 or Quadro FX Go 1000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.