Quadro 3000M X2 vs FirePro M4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking762not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.87no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameChelseaEXMF104
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date27 June 2012 (13 years ago)22 February 2011 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512240 ×2
Core clock speed675 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate21.6018.00 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS0.432 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs1632 ×2
TMUs3240 ×2
L1 Cache128 KB320 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Form factorMXM-Ano data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1000 MHz625 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s80 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
StereoOutput3D+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 June 2012 22 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 150 Watt

FirePro M4000 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 43% more advanced lithography process, and 355% lower power consumption.

3000M X2, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M4000 and Quadro 3000M X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 39 votes

Rate FirePro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro 3000M X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M4000 or Quadro 3000M X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.