GeForce 9200M vs FirePro M3900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1357
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.18
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameSeymourC79
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date19 October 2010 (15 years ago)15 October 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16016
Core clock speed750 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHzno data
Number of transistors370 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate6.0003.600
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Form factorchip-downno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2010 15 October 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 12 Watt

FirePro M3900 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 63% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 9200M, on the other hand, has 67% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M3900 and GeForce 9200M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M3900 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce 9200M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 13 votes

Rate FirePro M3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M3900 or GeForce 9200M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.