GeForce 8400 SE vs FirePro M3900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1475
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.25
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameSeymourG86S
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date19 October 2010 (15 years ago)1 August 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16016
Core clock speed750 MHz459 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHzno data
Number of transistors370 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate6.0003.672
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS0.02938 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Form factorchip-downno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth14 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2010 1 August 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 50 Watt

FirePro M3900 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M3900 and GeForce 8400 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M3900 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce 8400 SE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M3900
FirePro M3900
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE
GeForce 8400 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 13 votes

Rate FirePro M3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 8 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M3900 or GeForce 8400 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.