Radeon HD 7540D IGP vs GeForce GT 320M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1401not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.36no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameG96CScrapper
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 June 2009 (16 years ago)2 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$67

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32192
Core clock speed500 MHz760 MHz
Number of transistors314 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate8.0009.120
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS0.2918 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs1612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 June 2009 2 October 2012
Chip lithography 55 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 65 Watt

GT 320M has 364.3% lower power consumption.

HD 7540D IGP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 71.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 320M and Radeon HD 7540D IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 320M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 7540D IGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
GeForce GT 320M
AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP
Radeon HD 7540D IGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 135 votes

Rate GeForce GT 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 82 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7540D IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 320M or Radeon HD 7540D IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.