Radeon Pro 5600M vs FirePro M2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M2000 M3100 M3900 M4000 M4100 M4150 M4170 M5100 M5950 M6000 M6100 M8900
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro 5300M Pro 5500M Pro 5600M Pro W5300M Pro W5500M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro M2000 and Radeon Pro 5600M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

FirePro M2000
2012
1 GB GDDR5, 33 Watt
1.02

Pro 5600M outperforms M2000 by a whopping 2086% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro M2000 FirePro M2000
Pro 5600M Pro 5600M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1153284
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.3834.29
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameTurksNavi 12
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date1 July 2012 (13 years ago)15 June 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4802560
Core clock speed500 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1030 MHz
Number of transistors716 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate12.00164.8
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS5.274 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs24160
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Form factorchip-downno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz770 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s394.2 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
StereoOutput3D+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro M2000 1.02
Pro 5600M 22.30
+2086%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro M2000 425
Samples: 123
Pro 5600M 9324
+2094%
Samples: 29

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p9
−2011%
190−200
+2011%
Full HD16
−1775%
300−350
+1775%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−667%
45−50
+667%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3600%
70−75
+3600%
Fortnite 2−3
−5600%
110−120
+5600%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1200%
90−95
+1200%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−7100%
70−75
+7100%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−667%
45−50
+667%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−889%
85−90
+889%
Valorant 30−35
−400%
160−170
+400%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−904%
250−260
+904%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%
Dota 2 14−16
−693%
110−120
+693%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3600%
70−75
+3600%
Fortnite 2−3
−5600%
110−120
+5600%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1200%
90−95
+1200%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−7100%
70−75
+7100%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−667%
45−50
+667%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−889%
85−90
+889%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1017%
65−70
+1017%
Valorant 30−35
−400%
160−170
+400%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%
Dota 2 14−16
−693%
110−120
+693%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3600%
70−75
+3600%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1200%
90−95
+1200%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−667%
45−50
+667%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−889%
85−90
+889%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1017%
65−70
+1017%
Valorant 30−35
−400%
160−170
+400%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−5600%
110−120
+5600%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−1100%
45−50
+1100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
−2600%
160−170
+2600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−1482%
170−180
+1482%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 21−24
Far Cry 5 1−2
−5100%
50−55
+5100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1833%
55−60
+1833%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−5300%
50−55
+5300%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−200%
40−45
+200%
Valorant 5−6
−2540%
130−140
+2540%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how FirePro M2000 and Pro 5600M compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5600M is 2011% faster in 900p
  • Pro 5600M is 1775% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro 5600M is 7100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro 5600M performs better in 43 tests (66%)
  • there's a draw in 22 tests (34%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.02 22.30
Recency 1 July 2012 15 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 50 Watt

FirePro M2000 has 51.5% lower power consumption.

Pro 5600M, on the other hand, has a 2086.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M2000 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD FirePro M2000
FirePro M2000
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro M2000 FirePro M2000
vs
FX 3700M Quadro FX 3700M
Pro 5600M Radeon Pro 5600M
vs
RTX A1000 Mobile RTX A1000 Mobile
FirePro M2000 FirePro M2000
vs
FX 3600M Quadro FX 3600M
FirePro M2000 FirePro M2000
vs
RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
FirePro M2000 FirePro M2000
vs
RX 580X RX 580X
FirePro M2000 FirePro M2000
vs
GTX 1050 3 GB GTX 1050 3 GB
FirePro M2000 FirePro M2000
vs
RX 570G RX 570G
FirePro M2000 FirePro M2000
vs
RX 590 GME RX 590 GME
FirePro M2000 FirePro M2000
vs
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile
FirePro M2000 FirePro M2000
vs
RX 570 X2 RX 570 X2
FirePro M2000 FirePro M2000
vs
Arctic Sound-M Sound M
FirePro M2000 FirePro M2000
vs
Arc 7 A780 7 A780
FirePro M2000 FirePro M2000
vs
Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile Graphics 64EU Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 4 votes

Rate FirePro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 84 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M2000 or Radeon Pro 5600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.