Arctic Sound 2T vs FirePro M2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1153not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.38no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameTurksArctic Sound
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date1 July 2012 (13 years ago)2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4807680 ×2
Core clock speed500 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors716 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate12.00216.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS13.82 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs8120 ×2
TMUs24240 ×2
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorchip-downno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed800 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s1.23 TB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
StereoOutput3D+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 500 Watt

FirePro M2000 has 1415.2% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound 2T, on the other hand, has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M2000 and Arctic Sound 2T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M2000 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Arctic Sound 2T is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M2000
FirePro M2000
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
Arctic Sound 2T

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate FirePro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound 2T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M2000 or Arctic Sound 2T, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.