Radeon HD 7970 vs FirePro D700
Aggregate performance score
FirePro D700 outperforms Radeon HD 7970 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 350 | 355 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.22 | 4.00 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | GCN (2011−2017) |
| GPU code name | Tahiti | Tahiti XT |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | no data | reference |
| Release date | 18 January 2014 (10 years ago) | 22 December 2011 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $549 |
| Current price | $413 | $89 (0.2x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
FirePro D700 has 31% better value for money than HD 7970.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 925 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 4,313 million | 4,313 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 274 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 108.8 | 118.4 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,482 gflops | 3,789 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | no data | PCIe 2.1 x16 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 279 mm | 274 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5480 MHz | 1375 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 263.0 GB/s | 264 GB/s |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Eyefinity | no data | + |
| HDMI | no data | + |
| DisplayPort support | no data | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| AppAcceleration | no data | - |
| CrossFire | no data | 1 |
| Enduro | no data | - |
| FreeSync | no data | 1 |
| HD3D | no data | - |
| PowerTune | no data | - |
| TrueAudio | no data | - |
| ZeroCore | no data | - |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX® 11 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | no data |
| Mantle | no data | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 100−110
−5%
| 105
+5%
|
| Full HD | 100−110
+2%
| 98
−2%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.86 | 13.58 |
| Recency | 18 January 2014 | 22 December 2011 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 274 Watt | 300 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between FirePro D700 and Radeon HD 7970.
Be aware that FirePro D700 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7970 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
