Radeon 610M vs FirePro D700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
FirePro D500 FirePro D700 FirePro S9000 FirePro S9010 FirePro S9050 FirePro S10000 FirePro S10000 Passive FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB FirePro W8000 FirePro W9000 Radeon Sky 700 Radeon Sky 900
VS
Radeon 610 Radeon 610M Radeon 620 Radeon 625 Radeon 630 Radeon 660M Radeon 680M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro D700 with Radeon 610M, including specs and performance data.

FirePro D700
2014
6 GB GDDR5, 274 Watt
14.06
+387%

D700 outperforms 610M by a whopping 387% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

FirePro D700 FirePro D700
Radeon 610M Radeon 610M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking372790
Place by popularitynot in top-10050
Power efficiency3.5313.26
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTahitiDragon Range
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 January 2014 (11 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048128
Core clock speed850 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)274 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate108.817.60
Floating-point processing power3.482 TFLOPS0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs1288
Ray Tracing Coresno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1370 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth263.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDIPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65−70
+364%
14
−364%
1440p350−400
+343%
79
−343%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Elden Ring 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 19
+0%
19
+0%
Metro Exodus 16
+0%
16
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 10
+0%
10
+0%
Elden Ring 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14
+0%
14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16
+0%
16
+0%
Metro Exodus 11
+0%
11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 0−1 0−1
World of Tanks 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 11
+0%
11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
Elden Ring 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
World of Tanks 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Elden Ring 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Valorant 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how FirePro D700 and Radeon 610M compete in popular games:

  • FirePro D700 is 364% faster in 1080p
  • FirePro D700 is 343% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 54 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 14.06 2.89
Recency 18 January 2014 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 274 Watt 15 Watt

FirePro D700 has a 386.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 610M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 1726.7% lower power consumption.

The FirePro D700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 610M in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro D700 is a workstation card while Radeon 610M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD FirePro D700
FirePro D700
AMD Radeon 610M
Radeon 610M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
RTX A400 RTX A400
Radeon 610M Radeon 610M
vs
GeForce 940A GeForce 940A
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
Pro WX 5100 Radeon Pro WX 5100
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
vs
R5 Graphics Radeon R5 Graphics
Quadro P400 Quadro P400
vs
FX 5700 Engineering Sample GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000
vs
Pro VII Radeon Pro VII
FirePro V7900 FirePro V7900
vs
GT 740 GeForce GT 740
FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000
vs
RTX 3050 8 GB GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
GTX 960A GeForce GTX 960A
FirePro W8100 FirePro W8100
vs
GTX 1050 GeForce GTX 1050
Pro WX 5100 Radeon Pro WX 5100
vs
R7 350X OEM Radeon R7 350X OEM
GTX 850M NVIDIA 4070 Max-Q
vs
RTX 4070 Max-Q 850M
GT 750M GeForce GT 750M
vs
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU M3 Pro 18-Core GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.5 38 votes

Rate FirePro D700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 807 votes

Rate Radeon 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.