Quadro T500 Mobile vs FirePro D700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
FirePro D500 FirePro D700 FirePro S9000 FirePro S9010 FirePro S9050 FirePro S10000 FirePro S10000 Passive FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB FirePro W8000 FirePro W9000 Radeon Sky 700 Radeon Sky 900
VS
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro D700 with Quadro T500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

FirePro D700
2014
6 GB GDDR5, 274 Watt
12.81
+55.7%

D700 outperforms T500 Mobile by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
T500 Mobile Quadro T500

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking386501
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.4733.94
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTahitiTU117
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date18 January 2014 (11 years ago)2 December 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048896
Core clock speed850 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1695 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)274 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate108.894.92
Floating-point processing power3.482 TFLOPS3.037 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs12856

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1370 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth263.0 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDINo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD55−60
+52.8%
36
−52.8%
1440p21−24
+40%
15
−40%
4K24−27
+41.2%
17
−41.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Dota 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Far Cry 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 31
+0%
31
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 75
+0%
75
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+0%
19
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14
+0%
14
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how FirePro D700 and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • FirePro D700 is 53% faster in 1080p
  • FirePro D700 is 40% faster in 1440p
  • FirePro D700 is 41% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 51 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 12.81 8.23
Recency 18 January 2014 2 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 274 Watt 18 Watt

FirePro D700 has a 55.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T500 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1422.2% lower power consumption.

The FirePro D700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T500 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro D700 is a workstation card while Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD FirePro D700
FirePro D700
NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Quadro T500
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
Pro WX 5100 Radeon Pro WX 5100
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
vs
Pro W5500M Radeon Pro W5500M
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
GRID M60-2Q GRID M60 2Q
RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB
vs
GT 720 GT 720
RTX 5090 D GeForce RTX 5090 D
vs
GT 625 OEM GT 625 OEM
Radeon 880M Radeon 880M
vs
GTX 560 GTX 560
RTX 5090 D GeForce RTX 5090 D
vs
GT 640M Mac Edition GT 640M Mac Edition
M4000M Quadro M4000M
vs
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
FX 330 Quadro FX 330
vs
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q
vs
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
vs
R7 Graphics R7 Graphics
8600M GT SLI GeForce 8600M GT SLI
vs
ATI HD 3470 HD 3470
ATI HD 2400 XT Radeon HD 2400 XT
vs
ATI HD 2400 PRO AGP HD 2400 PRO AGP

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.5 38 votes

Rate FirePro D700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 111 votes

Rate Quadro T500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro D700 or Quadro T500 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.