GeForce GTX 950 vs FirePro D700

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FirePro D700
2014
6 GB GDDR5
13.84
+0.4%

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking347348
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation5.086.03
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameTahitiGM206
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 January 2014 (10 years ago)20 August 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$159
Current price$413 $12.88 (0.1x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 950 has 19% better value for money than FirePro D700.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048768
CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed850 MHz1024 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1188 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)274 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate108.849.2 billion/sec
Floating-point performance3,482 gflops1,825 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length279 mm7.938" (20.2 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)no data350 Watt
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pins
SLI optionsno data+

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5480 MHz6.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth263.0 GB/s105.6 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDIDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Multi monitor supportno data4 displays
HDMIno data+
HDCPno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
G-SYNC supportno data+
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStreamno data+
GeForce ShadowPlayno data+
GPU Boostno data2.0
GameWorksno data+

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDAno data+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
−4%
52
+4%
4K21−24
+0%
21
+0%

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 13.84 13.79
Recency 18 January 2014 20 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 274 Watt 90 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between FirePro D700 and GeForce GTX 950.

Be aware that FirePro D700 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 950 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro D700
FirePro D700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
GeForce GTX 950

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 34 votes

Rate FirePro D700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1916 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.