GeForce 830A vs FirePro D700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro D700 with GeForce 830A, including specs and performance data.

FirePro D700
2014
6 GB GDDR5, 274 Watt
12.89
+360%

D700 outperforms 830A by a whopping 360% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking427839
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.626.53
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameTahitiGM108
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 January 2014 (12 years ago)22 July 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048256
Core clock speed850 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1150 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)274 Watt33 Watt
Texture fill rate108.818.40
Floating-point processing power3.482 TFLOPS0.5888 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs12816
L1 Cache512 KB128 KB
L2 Cache768 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1370 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth263.0 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.89 2.80
Recency 18 January 2014 22 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 274 Watt 33 Watt

FirePro D700 has a 360% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GeForce 830A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 730% lower power consumption.

The FirePro D700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 830A in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro D700 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 830A is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 38 votes

Rate FirePro D700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 9 votes

Rate GeForce 830A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro D700 or GeForce 830A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.