FirePro M6000 vs FirePro D700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
D500 D700 S9000 S9010 S9050 S10000 S10000 Passive S10000 Passive 12GB W8000 W9000 Radeon Sky 700 Radeon Sky 900
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M2000 M3100 M3900 M4000 M4100 M4150 M4170 M5100 M5950 M6000 M6100 M8900

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro D700 with FirePro M6000, including specs and performance data.

FirePro D700
2014
6 GB GDDR5, 274 Watt
12.89
+196%

D700 outperforms M6000 by a whopping 196% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
FirePro M6000 FirePro M6000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking427715
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.627.79
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameTahitiHeathrow
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date18 January 2014 (12 years ago)1 July 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048640
Core clock speed850 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)274 Watt43 Watt
Texture fill rate108.832.00
Floating-point processing power3.482 TFLOPS1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs12840
L1 Cache512 KB160 KB
L2 Cache768 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno datan/a
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorno dataMXM-B
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1370 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth263.0 GB/s72 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDINo outputs
StereoOutput3D-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p170−180
+193%
58
−193%
Full HD120−130
+186%
42
−186%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how FirePro D700 and FirePro M6000 compete in popular games:

  • FirePro D700 is 193% faster in 900p
  • FirePro D700 is 186% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 56 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 12.89 4.35
Recency 18 January 2014 1 July 2012
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 274 Watt 43 Watt

FirePro D700 has a 196% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

FirePro M6000, on the other hand, has 537% lower power consumption.

The FirePro D700 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro D700 is a workstation graphics card while FirePro M6000 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
CMP 30HX CMP 30HX
FirePro M6000 FirePro M6000
vs
FirePro M5100 FirePro M5100
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
FirePro D500 FirePro D500
vs
CMP 40HX CMP 40HX
FirePro D500 FirePro D500
vs
Pro V620 Pro V620
FirePro D500 FirePro D500
vs
520 Mobile DDR3 Radeon 520 Mobile DDR3
FirePro D500 FirePro D500
vs
Arc B570 Arc B570
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
W7170M FirePro W7170M
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
GT 735M GT 735M
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
R7 370 R7 370
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
Go 7600 Go 7600
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
R7 250XE R7 250XE
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
HD 7850 HD 7850

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.6 40 votes

Rate FirePro D700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 15 votes

Rate FirePro M6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro D700 or FirePro M6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.