Radeon R9 M370X vs FirePro D500

#ad 
Buy
FirePro D500 FirePro D700 FirePro S9000 FirePro S9050 FirePro S10000 FirePro S10000 Passive FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB FirePro W8000 FirePro W9000 FirePro W9000 X2 Radeon Sky 700 Radeon Sky 900
VS
Radeon R9 M370X Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition Radeon R9 M375 Radeon R9 M375X

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro D500 with Radeon R9 M370X, including specs and performance data.

FirePro D500
2014
3 GB GDDR5, 274 Watt
10.31
+166%

D500 outperforms R9 M370X by a whopping 166% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro D500 FirePro D500
R9 M370X R9 M370X

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking445713
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.66no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameTahitiCape Verde
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 January 2014 (11 years ago)19 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536640
Core clock speed725 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million1500 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)274 Wattno data
Texture fill rate69.60no data
Floating-point processing power2.227 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs96no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz4500 MHz
Memory bandwidth243.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDIno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (FL 11_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
+165%
34
−165%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 103
+0%
103
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+0%
15
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+0%
8
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how FirePro D500 and R9 M370X compete in popular games:

  • FirePro D500 is 165% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.31 3.88
Recency 18 January 2014 19 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 2 GB

FirePro D500 has a 165.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

R9 M370X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The FirePro D500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M370X in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro D500 is a workstation card while Radeon R9 M370X is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD FirePro D500
FirePro D500
AMD Radeon R9 M370X
Radeon R9 M370X
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro D500 FirePro D500
vs
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
R9 M370X Radeon R9 M370X
vs
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
FirePro D500 FirePro D500
vs
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
GTX 280 GeForce GTX 280
vs
FX 5200 FX 5200
RTX 4080 Ti RTX 4080 Ti
vs
GTX 765M 765M
GTX 580M GeForce GTX 580M
vs
Radeon 610M Radeon 610M
R7 350X OEM Radeon R7 350X OEM
vs
GT 740 OEM GT 740 OEM
RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB
vs
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
M1000M Quadro M1000M
vs
GeForce 810M GeForce 810M
GTX 480 512 GTX 480 Core 512
vs
GTX 490 490
GTX 860M GeForce GTX 860M
vs
RX 6550M RX 6550M
GTX 1660 Mobile GeForce GTX 1660 Mobile
vs
T550 Mobile T550 Mobile
R9 290X Radeon R9 290X
vs
GeForce 930MX GeForce 930MX

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 21 vote

Rate FirePro D500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 57 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M370X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro D500 or Radeon R9 M370X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.