Radeon R7 M370 vs FirePro D500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
D500 D700 S9000 S9010 S9050 S10000 S10000 Passive S10000 Passive 12GB W8000 W9000 Radeon Sky 700 Radeon Sky 900
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M340 M350 M350 2GB M360 M365X M370 M380

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro D500 with Radeon R7 M370, including specs and performance data.

FirePro D500
2014
3 GB GDDR5, 274 Watt
9.88
+191%

D500 outperforms R7 M370 by a whopping 191% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro D500 FirePro D500
R7 M370 R7 M370

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking484778
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.77no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameTahitiLitho
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 January 2014 (11 years ago)5 May 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536384
Core clock speed725 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data960 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million690 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)274 Wattno data
Texture fill rate69.6023.04
Floating-point processing power2.227 TFLOPS0.7373 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs9624
L1 Cache384 KB96 KB
L2 Cache768 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth243.8 GB/s73.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDINo outputs
Eyefinity-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)DirectX® 12
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.2Not Listed
Vulkan1.2.131-
Mantle-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
+186%
14
−186%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+0%
10
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
+0%
6
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how FirePro D500 and R7 M370 compete in popular games:

  • FirePro D500 is 186% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.88 3.39
Recency 18 January 2014 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 4 GB

FirePro D500 has a 191.4% higher aggregate performance score.

R7 M370, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The FirePro D500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M370 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro D500 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 M370 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD FirePro D500
FirePro D500
AMD Radeon R7 M370
Radeon R7 M370
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro D500 FirePro D500
vs
FirePro W8000 FirePro W8000
R7 M370 Radeon R7 M370
vs
Maxwell GPU Surface Book Maxwell GPU Surface Book
FirePro D500 FirePro D500
vs
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
vs
6200 X2 PCI GeForce 6200 X2 PCI
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
vs
RX 560 XT Radeon RX 560 XT
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
vs
RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
vs
RTX A2000 RTX A2000
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
vs
RTX 4090 GeForce RTX 4090
FirePro D500 FirePro D500
vs
GT 740M GeForce GT 740M
FirePro D500 FirePro D500
vs
Quadro P620 Quadro P620
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Iris Pro Graphics 5200
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
HD 6490M Radeon HD 6490M
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
R9 M370X Mac Edition Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 22 votes

Rate FirePro D500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 87 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro D500 or Radeon R7 M370, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.