Radeon RX Vega 11 vs FirePro D300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
D300 R5000 S7000 W4000 W5000 W5000 DVI W7000 Radeon Sky 500
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11 Efficient RX Vega 11 Embedded Vega 3 Efficient Vega 6 Embedded Vega 8 Efficient Vega 8 Embedded Vega 11 Embedded

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro D300 with Radeon RX Vega 11, including specs and performance data.

FirePro D300
2014
2 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
9.22
+85.1%

D300 outperforms RX Vega 11 by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking505673
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.7410.97
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code namePitcairnRaven
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 January 2014 (11 years ago)10 May 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280704
Core clock speed850 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1251 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate68.0055.04
Floating-point processing power2.176 TFLOPS1.761 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs8044
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length242 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1270 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth162.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
+78.6%
28
−78.6%
1440p10−12
+66.7%
6
−66.7%
4K21−24
+75%
12
−75%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 31
+0%
31
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 19
+0%
19
+0%
Fortnite 86
+0%
86
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 38
+0%
38
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 46
+0%
46
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Fortnite 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
+0%
17
+0%
Metro Exodus 9
+0%
9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+0%
14
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 25
+0%
25
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 17
+0%
17
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 29
+0%
29
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+0%
10
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8
+0%
8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 17
+0%
17
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12
+0%
12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how FirePro D300 and RX Vega 11 compete in popular games:

  • FirePro D300 is 79% faster in 1080p
  • FirePro D300 is 67% faster in 1440p
  • FirePro D300 is 75% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.22 4.98
Recency 18 January 2014 10 May 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 35 Watt

FirePro D300 has a 85.1% higher aggregate performance score.

RX Vega 11, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 328.6% lower power consumption.

The FirePro D300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 11 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro D300 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 11 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD FirePro D300
FirePro D300
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro D300 FirePro D300
vs
GRID M60-8Q GRID M60-8Q
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
vs
Radeon 550 Radeon 550
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
vs
Tesla K8 Tesla K8
S10000 Passive 12GB FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
vs
RTX 3000 Mobile Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
S10000 Passive 12GB FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
vs
A100 PCIe A100 PCIe
S10000 Passive 12GB FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
S10000 Passive 12GB FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
vs
GTX 965M 4 GB GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB
S10000 Passive 12GB FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
vs
615 OEM GeForce 615 OEM
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
vs
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
vs
R9 M390 Mac Edition Radeon R9 M390 Mac Edition
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
vs
RX 6800S Radeon RX 6800S
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
vs
Arc 3 A350M Arc 3 A350M
FirePro D500 FirePro D500
vs
Pro 450 Radeon Pro 450

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 35 votes

Rate FirePro D300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 2011 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro D300 or Radeon RX Vega 11, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.