GeForce 7300 GS vs FirePro D300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro D300 with GeForce 7300 GS, including specs and performance data.

FirePro D300
2014
2 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
9.27
+4779%

D300 outperforms 7300 GS by a whopping 4779% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5141467
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.760.64
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code namePitcairnG72
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 January 2014 (12 years ago)18 January 2006 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed850 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million112 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate68.001.800
Floating-point processing power2.176 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs804
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length242 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz266 MHz
Memory bandwidth162.6 GB/s4.256 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.27 0.19
Recency 18 January 2014 18 January 2006
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 23 Watt

FirePro D300 has a 4779% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221% more advanced lithography process.

7300 GS, on the other hand, has 552% lower power consumption.

The FirePro D300 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7300 GS in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro D300 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 7300 GS is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 37 votes

Rate FirePro D300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 100 votes

Rate GeForce 7300 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro D300 or GeForce 7300 GS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.