Radeon RX 6700 vs FirePro A320
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 93 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 19.87 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | Trinity GL | Navi 22 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 6 June 2012 (13 years ago) | 9 June 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 2304 |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 1941 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 955 MHz | 2450 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,303 million | 17,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 175 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 22.92 | 352.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.7334 TFLOPS | 11.29 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 64 |
| TMUs | 24 | 144 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 36 |
| L0 Cache | no data | 576 KB |
| L1 Cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 3 MB |
| L3 Cache | no data | 80 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | IGP | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 10 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 160 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 320.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 June 2012 | 9 June 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 175 Watt |
FirePro A320 has 75% lower power consumption.
RX 6700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between FirePro A320 and Radeon RX 6700. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that FirePro A320 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6700 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
