GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs FirePro 2270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1356not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.74no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameCedarGT200B
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date31 January 2011 (14 years ago)15 January 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80240
Core clock speed600 MHz648 MHz
Number of transistors292 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt204 Watt
Texture fill rate4.80051.84
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPS0.7085 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs880
L1 Cache8 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length170 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1242 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s159.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-592x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2011 15 January 2009
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 204 Watt

FirePro 2270 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 1260% lower power consumption.

GTX 285 Mac Edition, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between FirePro 2270 and GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro 2270 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro 2270
FirePro 2270
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 10 votes

Rate FirePro 2270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro 2270 or GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.