GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB vs ATI FireMV 2260

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated53
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data83.94
Power efficiencyno data22.82
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameRV620GB206
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2008 (17 years ago)16 April 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores404608
Core clock speed500 MHz2407 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2572 MHz
Number of transistors181 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate2.000370.4
Floating-point processing powerno data23.7 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs4144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Length168 mm241 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MBps1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 180 Watt

ATI FireMV 2260 has 1100% lower power consumption.

RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB, on the other hand, has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireMV 2260 and GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireMV 2260
FireMV 2260
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 196 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireMV 2260 or GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.