Radeon 660M vs Quadro K100M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated543
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.91
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK107Rembrandt+
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date22 August 2014 (10 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192384
Core clock speed850 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate13.6045.60
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPS1.459 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1624
Ray Tracing Coresno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 August 2014 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 40 Watt

Quadro K100M has 14.3% lower power consumption.

Radeon 660M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K100M and Radeon 660M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K100M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon 660M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K100M
Quadro K100M
AMD Radeon 660M
Radeon 660M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro K100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 403 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K100M or Radeon 660M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.