T400 Mobile vs ATI FireGL X1-256

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameR300TU117
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 July 2002 (23 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data896
Core clock speed325 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors110 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate2.60079.80
Floating-point processing powerno data2.554 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs856

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed310 MHz10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth19.84 GB/s80 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 18 Watt

T400 Mobile has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1150% more advanced lithography process, and 106% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireGL X1-256 and T400 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL X1-256 is a workstation graphics card while T400 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL X1-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate T400 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL X1-256 or T400 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.