Radeon R7 350 640SP vs ATI FireGL X1-256

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameR300Cape Verde
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 July 2002 (23 years ago)7 January 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data640
Core clock speed325 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistors110 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate2.60037.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.184 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs840
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed310 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.84 GB/s72 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 7 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 55 Watt

ATI FireGL X1-256 has 48.6% lower power consumption.

R7 350 640SP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL X1-256 and Radeon R7 350 640SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL X1-256 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 350 640SP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL X1-256
FireGL X1-256
AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP
Radeon R7 350 640SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL X1-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Radeon R7 350 640SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL X1-256 or Radeon R7 350 640SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.