CMP 100HX-210 vs ATI FireGL X1-256

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameR300GV100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 July 2002 (23 years ago)2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data5120
Core clock speed325 MHz555 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1147 MHz
Number of transistors110 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate2.600367.0
Floating-point processing powerno data11.75 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs8320
Tensor Coresno data640
L1 Cacheno data7.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 1.0 x1
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed310 MHz810 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.84 GB/s829.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 250 Watt

ATI FireGL X1-256 has 575.7% lower power consumption.

CMP 100HX-210, on the other hand, has a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL X1-256 and CMP 100HX-210. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL X1-256
FireGL X1-256
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210
CMP 100HX-210

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL X1-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 9 votes

Rate CMP 100HX-210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL X1-256 or CMP 100HX-210, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.