Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand vs ATI FireGL 9800 X2-256T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameR360Mars
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2003 (22 years ago)10 January 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed412 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speedno data700 MHz
Number of transistors117 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Texture fill rate3.29616.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5376 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs824
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed344 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.02 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2003 10 January 2014
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

R5 M240 Rebrand has an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL 9800 X2-256T and Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL 9800 X2-256T is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL 9800 X2-256T
FireGL 9800 X2-256T
AMD Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand
Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL 9800 X2-256T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 8 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL 9800 X2-256T or Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.